“OnTime” and the Agile Manifesto, my experience

Tenant #5:

 Build projects around motivated individuals. Give them the environment and support they need, and trust them to get the job done.

OnTime 2010:

I believe OnTime meets this requirement very well.  I have found the tool excellent for collaboratively planning and building software.   The ability to very easily monitor my timelines visually and quickly make changes to my project plans as requirements and deadlines change is priceless and extremely motivating.

Tenant #6:

 The most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a development team is face-to-face conversation.

OnTime 2010:

I have not seen a face-to-face collaboration capability in this tool.  I guess it would be nice to add a functionality that would allow users a “video conference”, Net Meeting like capability which would enhance the experience. 

This entry was posted in Automated Agile Project Management Tools. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to “OnTime” and the Agile Manifesto, my experience

  1. Allison says:

    Agile Antipattern: Changing the Definition of Done Bob Hartman discusses how the prrssuee to meet deadlines is simply deficit spending on your project with a bill that will get paid off sooner than you think.

  2. Amir says:

    Agile Antipattern: Changing the Definition of Done Bob Hartman discusses how the prseruse to meet deadlines is simply deficit spending on your project with a bill that will get paid off sooner than you think.

  3. Michelle says:

    The agility you refer to here is the prpcinile reason I work for myself and not a large corporation. I can’t stand red tape and time wasting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>